{"id":317,"date":"2004-01-07T02:07:23-05:00","date_gmt":"2004-01-07T10:07:23+00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/wordpress\/?p=317"},"modified":"2004-01-07T02:07:23-05:00","modified_gmt":"2004-01-07T10:07:23+00:00","slug":"57-channels-give-or-take-600-and-nothin-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/2004\/01\/07\/57-channels-give-or-take-600-and-nothin-on\/","title":{"rendered":"57 channels (give or take 600) and nothin&#8217;&nbsp;on"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='e-content'><p>Two new entries today in Tim Bray&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tbray.org\/ongoing\/When\/200x\/2004\/01\/03\/TPM1\"><abbr title=\"Technology Predictor Success Matrix\">TPSM<\/abbr><\/a> series.  He&#8217;s started his actual analysis of and against the candidate predictors <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tbray.org\/ongoing\/When\/200x\/2004\/01\/05\/TPSM-Management\">Management Approval<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tbray.org\/ongoing\/When\/200x\/2004\/01\/06\/TPSM-Standardization\">Standardization<\/a>.  Again, I mostly agree with his rankings and explanations, except for <abbr title=\"interactive television\">iTV<\/abbr>.<\/p>\n\n<p>The first predictor, <cite class=\"title\">Management Approval<\/cite>, shows nothing more clearly than that <q>one of these things is not like the other<\/q>.  Unlike twelve of the fourteen technologies he&#8217;s evaluating (the other exception being VRML) iTV doesn&#8217;t have much use, and hence little visibility, in a general corporate IT setting; management approval is about as applicable to iTV in business as it is to four-slice bagel toasters.  In the cable industry, however, iTV doesn&#8217;t exactly sneak in to an <abbr title=\"multiple services operator, i.e. a cable or satellite company\">MSO<\/abbr> without a <em>lot<\/em> of involvement from higher-ups.  As for being featured in Forbes more than once, <a title=\"over 100 hits from forbes.com\" href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=+site:www.forbes.com+%22interactive+television%22+forbes\">Google begs to differ<\/a>.  iTV at least rates the same <cite class=\"term\">7<\/cite> as the WWW, albeit in a specific domain.<\/p>\n\n<p>In his <cite class=\"title\">Standardization<\/cite> analysis of the iTV space Bray shows a little of <a title=\"500 channels and a BUY button\" href=\"http:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/archives\/2004\/01\/05\/500-channels-and-a-buy-button\">what I complained about initially<\/a>: his view of the tech seems to be limited to the early 1990s.  Today&#8217;s iTV tech is, if not dominated, then at least highly influenced by standards, and is becoming more so every day.  It&#8217;s been said that <q>the nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from,<\/q> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22interactive%20television%22%20standard\">iTV certainly proves that rule<\/a>.  It deserves at least the same <cite class=\"term\">3<\/cite> rating that <cite class=\"title\">UNIX\/C<\/cite> receives for <q>Posix work, which while useful has never been central to the story<\/q>; modern iTV is hardly <q>a proprietary offering from a single vendor with poor developer relations<\/q> (although certain implementations remain so), and thus probably rates about a 5 for the similarity of current settop developments to the <cite class=\"term\">Browser Wars<\/cite>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb and guess that Bray&#8217;s next pseudo-random topic will be <cite class=\"title\">Investor support<\/cite>, and predict that the results will begin to coalesce.  (It&#8217;s not that far, really&#8230; he almost states the latter in the last paragraph of <cite class=\"title\">Standardization<\/cite>.)<\/p><\/div><div class=\"syndication-links\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Two new entries today in Tim Bray&#8217;s TPSM series. He&#8217;s started his actual analysis of and against the candidate predictors Management Approval and Standardization. Again, I mostly agree with his rankings and explanations, except for iTV. The first predictor, Management Approval, shows nothing more clearly than that one of these things is not like the&hellip;","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"mf2_syndication":[],"venue_id":0},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"kind":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/peterjanes.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}