MovableWordTypePress

I’ve been considering switching weblogging software recently. MovableType 2.6 has been good enough for a while, but it’s stagnated, even with the release of version 3.0. (There’s also the whole freedom issue, although that’s been less of a factor in my thinking.)

I’m most interested in WordPress. However, it relies completely on PHP, which I have an extreme (and perhaps undeserved) dislike for. Call me crazy (you’re crazy!) but I prefer to not introduce a lot of CPU, RAM, network and database overhead just to serve what is, 99.9% of the time, static content; I’m also not a big fan of the single point of failure. Disk space is cheap: my web hosting provider has increased the allocation given to every user by over 150% since I signed up less than a year ago. And I’ve never had an HTML-based site go completely offline due to a typo in a template; sure, comment posting or entry searching may not work for a bit, but the content of the site still exists.

What I’d really like is a form of funky caching, where pages are generated only when they (or their associated resources) change. A request to view any page would retrieve the HTML source directly from disk, not go through the page generator or even a script that redirects to the page.

So, pending a change of heart, I’m going to stay with MovableType 2.6. To slightly paraphrase Weird Al Yankovic,

You’re sort of everything I ever wanted
You’re not perfect, but I love you anyhow
You’re the software that I always dreamed of
Well, not really, but you’re good enough for now.

Damn lies

Via Rebecca Blood is a chart from the U.S Department of Energy that shows, clearly, that recent gas prices are the cheapest they’ve ever been. I’d like to see companion charts that show the amount of fuel used by cars over the same period.

In a similar vein, the Internet Movie Database seems to have removed their lists of all-time highest-grossing movies when adjusted for inflation and average ticket price, although they still have their unadjusted lists (which favour newer movies). I’ve found a similar list at Rave Central, but I’m curious why IMDb dropped theirs. Pressure from Hollywood, perhaps?

sdrawkcab

Proving once again that everything is on the Internet, I just came across a study that found that about 25% of Japanese people read newspapers back-to-front. Reading the paper backwards is a habit I’ve had for a long time; I don’t just read from the last section to the first, but from the last page of each section to the first. (There’s one exception: the local Sunday paper comes in a tabloid format with pull-out sections, and I tend to read the sections in order, each section front to back.) I’ve come across a few people that behave similarly, but the fraction who do is nowhere near a quarter.

This begs the question, then, of whether this is a predominantly Japanese trait or if it’s simply more common than my personal experience would indicate. I don’t have enough regular readers–at least, not enough who actively comment–to generate anything close to a reasonable statistical sample, but I’ll put it out there anyway: in what order do you read your newspaper?

Crazy busy

What a month. More than a little of my non-blogging time has had something to do with this. I’m not sure exactly when the rate of posts will pick up again, but the dearth of updates is just an aberration. I’m still here!

Spice of life

At the risk of destroying whatever smidgen of credibility I’ve gained with folks out there, I’m going to confess that I actually watched–and, worse, enjoyed–The Nick & Jessica Variety Show tonight. There were high points and low points–Jessica’s American Idol-worthy wails on Take My Breath Away being the worst of the latter–but overall it was an amazing simulation of a better-than-average 1970s-era variety show.

High- and low-lights:

  • Both stars handle self-parody well: Nick La Shave and the Mouseketeer bit were probably the most fun.
  • I’m not sure exactly what Simpson was trying to accomplish in her duet with Jewel: was it mockery of Jewel’s style, an impression of Cher, or the way she actually sings?
  • Mr. T. I pity the fool who doesn’t like T. Ten Seconds Of Awkwardness wouldn’t have been possible with anyone else.
  • The goofy jokes in the She Works Hard for the Money montage… heard ’em all, but again they were able to pull them off.
  • The real Kermit and Piggy, straight from the Muppet Show set, and not the impostors that have replaced them for the last 20-odd years.
  • Jessica’s… um… smashes bottle over head.
  • I’ve Got You (Babe). It had to be done, it had to be the finale, and it worked.

I’ve been contemplating writing a screed about how current popular music is overwhelmingly angry–I even have difficulty listening to Weird Al Yankovic’s last album of parodies, and I’ve been a fan of his forever–but the show tonight was enough goofy, simple, plain ol’ fun that I’m just too happy to get any of it down. They got it right.

Access

People are not dumb unless you treat them as dumb.

Two major things marred what was otherwise a fairly good episode of The West Wing tonight: the beginning and the end.

The beginning of the episode was unconventional in that there was no pre-teaser recap. They’ve become less and less relevant this season anyway as the extended storylines have been entirely dropped in the post-Sorkin reset to zero Wing era. Instead, the episode began with a still image indicating to the audience that yes, despite the PBS-style blurb they’re about to see, this really is going to be The West Wing. Are the producers (or executives) so concerned with fifteen seconds of mild confusion on the part of their viewers that they felt it necessary to pat the viewers on the head with such a condescending gesture? If so, why did they then choose to include the tape glitch and dead air just before the episode title, at the risk of confusing their obviously muddle-headed viewers even further? If the full title sequence hadn’t been included after the teaser it might be understandable, though still strictly unnecessary, but as broadcast it came across as yet another example of the new pandering attitude the series has taken.

The end of the episode was equally as galling, though from a different angle. Throughout the pseudo-documentary the audience was told repeatedly that the events shown occurred in the Bartlet administration’s second term, and that the current time is just after the term finished; in other words, the events depicted occurred about three years ago. Doing the math, this means that C.J. Cregg has only been out of the press secretary role for a year. Yet what’s the final line of the episode/documentary? A gratuitous reference to her still being the only woman to serve two terms as White House press secretary. Yup, that’s correct: the writer is highlighting the fact that in the single year that’s passed since Cregg et al left office, no other woman has spent eight years doing the same job. Unless time travel is possible in the Wing universe, it’s simply impossible, and no self-respecting documentarian would even think to write such a nonsensical line.

I’m willing to overlook minor things, like the fact that MSNBC is highlighted as the first network to have footage of the events–that couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the fact that sister company NBC broadcasts the show, could it?–because on the whole Access was one of the better episodes this season. That being said, it doesn’t raise my opinion of this season at all: I previously called it a total meltdown, and I stand by that estimation. All I can do is wonder how much better Aaron Sorkin’s version of this episode (and season) might have been, and hope that Warner Brothers, John Wells Productions and NBC get down on their collective knees to apologize to him for ruining the series and bring him back.

We get the point already

And the award for most overblown, redundant, built-by-marketing-droids user-agent string goes to…

Yahoo-VerticalCrawler-FormerWebCrawler/3.9 crawler at trd dot overture dot com; http://www.alltheweb.com/help/webmaster/crawler